Real Housewife of Beverly Hills Net Worth: Cast Guide

When someone searches "real housewife of Beverly Hills net worth," they usually want one of two things: a quick number for a specific cast member, or a ranked list of the whole RHOBH cast so they can compare. This guide gives you both, explains exactly how those numbers are built (and where they fall short), and helps you figure out why you'll see wildly different figures on different sites for the same person.

Series net worth vs. cast member net worth: what the search usually means

"Real Housewives of Beverly Hills net worth" is technically ambiguous. It could mean the collective wealth of the franchise, the average net worth of active cast members, or a single housewife's individual number. In practice, almost every reader asking this question wants the individual cast-member breakdown, with names like Bozoma, Dana, and Crystal ranking highest in search intent. The franchise itself (owned by Bravo/NBCUniversal) is not something fans can research meaningfully because it's folded into a much larger corporate structure. So when this site publishes RHOBH net worth content, the focus is always the cast women themselves: what they own, what they've earned, and what credible estimates say their total wealth looks like.

How net worth is actually calculated for reality TV stars

Net worth is assets minus liabilities, full stop. That sounds simple, but for a reality TV personality it gets complicated fast. The inputs typically include TV appearance fees and contracts, endorsement and brand deal income, business ownership stakes, real estate (purchase prices and market estimates), investment accounts, and any publicly disclosed financial information from court records or business filings. What it does not include is future earnings or speculative valuations with no grounding in evidence.

For privately held businesses, estimators use the same general logic that Forbes applies to its billionaire rankings: revenue and profit estimates are combined with industry-specific valuation multiples, then discounted for the fact that private company stakes are harder to sell quickly (a "liquidity discount"). That means a housewife who co-founded a consumer packaged goods brand isn't simply worth her salary times some number of years. Her stake in the company gets valued on its own, which is why business ownership is often the single biggest variable in a reality star's net worth estimate.

Real estate is usually the most verifiable input because property records are public in most U.S. counties. TV contracts and brand deals are almost never disclosed, so those get estimated based on comparable deals reported elsewhere in the industry. And liabilities, including mortgages, business loans, and legal judgments, are largely invisible unless they show up in court filings. That's why every responsible net worth estimate on this site comes with a range rather than a single precise number, and why you should treat any site publishing a single dollar figure without a methodology note as a rough guess at best.

The full RHOBH cast at a glance: ranges and averages

The Beverly Hills cast has historically skewed wealthier than most other Real Housewives franchises, partly because of the city's association with the entertainment industry and partly because producers have tended to cast women with established business backgrounds or significant inherited/married wealth. Across seasons 1 through 14, individual cast net worth estimates have ranged from roughly $500,000 on the low end to several hundred million dollars at the top. The current active cast sits somewhere between $8 million and $100 million depending on the individual, with the median probably landing in the $20–$40 million range when you average across confirmed main cast members.

A few notes on that table: Kathy Hilton's figure reflects family and marital wealth, not necessarily her individual earned wealth, and is presented because it's the number most cited in media roundups. Erika Jayne's situation is unique because of ongoing litigation tied to the Tom Girardi legal fallout, which makes any net worth estimate particularly unreliable. And Dana Wilkey's number is genuinely unclear, which we'll address in detail below.

Individual breakdowns: Bozoma, Dana, Crystal, and the full cast

Bozoma "Boz" Saint John

Bozoma Saint John joined RHOBH in Season 14 with one of the most impressive corporate resumes any housewife has ever brought to the show. Her C-suite sequence includes Chief Business Officer at Uber (2017–2018), CMO at Endeavor (2018–2020), and Chief Marketing Officer at Netflix (2020–March 2022). Each of those roles comes with a compensation package in the millions, including base salary, bonuses, and in the case of Netflix and Uber, stock options or equity that can multiply total compensation significantly. Estimators use that career arc as a major input, which is why most credible figures for her land between $10 million and $30 million. One source cites exactly $10 million; another outlet reports a figure "over $30 million" citing a different database entirely. That gap is real and explained in the verification section below.

Dana Wilkey

Dana Wilkey appeared as a "Friend of the Housewives" in Seasons 2 and 3 and is probably best remembered for her $25,000 sunglasses moment. Online estimates for her net worth range from negligible to mid-seven figures, but there's a meaningful complication: in 2021, the U.S. Department of Justice unsealed an indictment naming Dana Ann Wilkey as president of Adwil Agency, Inc., describing alleged kickbacks totaling approximately $360,000 and related fraud schemes involving Blue Shield of California. Legal exposure of that kind directly affects net worth (attorney fees, potential judgments, asset seizure), which means any pre-indictment estimate became immediately unreliable the moment that case was filed. Sites that still show an older high estimate with no acknowledgment of the legal situation should be treated as out of date and potentially misleading.

Crystal Kung Minkoff

Crystal Kung Minkoff joined in Season 11 and has one of the more verifiable wealth stories on the current cast. She co-founded Real Coco, the coconut water company at the center of much of her storyline, with the brand founded in 2012 and subsequently expanded into major retail chains including Smart & Final. Real Coco is registered as a privately held company, which means its exact valuation is not public, but the retail expansion gives analysts a rough revenue proxy to work with. Celebrity Net Worth lists her at $30 million as of their last update on February 3, 2026, and that figure likely captures both her business stake and her husband Rob Minkoff's career earnings in film production. That $30 million estimate is one of the more consistently cited figures in the RHOBH net worth conversation, and it has at least a published update date you can verify.

Kyle Richards

Kyle Richards has been on the show since Season 1 and is the clearest example of how RHOBH appearance itself compounds wealth. She earns an estimated $270,000 per episode in later seasons (per various entertainment industry reports), holds significant real estate in Beverly Hills and Aspen, and has longstanding acting credits and production involvement. Most credible estimates land her at or above $100 million, making her one of the wealthier self-made women in the franchise's history.

Lisa Vanderpump

Lisa Vanderpump left the main cast after Season 9 but remains one of the most recognized names associated with RHOBH. Her wealth is built primarily on her restaurant and bar group (SUR, TomTom, Pump, Vanderpump Rules spinoff revenue) combined with brand partnerships. Estimates generally land between $75 million and $90 million, though the restaurant industry's post-pandemic volatility means those numbers have fluctuated.

Sutton Stracke

Sutton Stracke's wealth is largely attributed to her divorce settlement from Christian Stracke, a PIMCO executive. She also operates a fashion boutique in Los Angeles. Estimates typically range from $50 million to $60 million, with the settlement being the primary driver rather than business earnings.

Garcelle Beauvais

Garcelle Beauvais has a long acting career predating RHOBH and has added hosting and brand work since joining in Season 10. Her estimates typically land in the $8 million to $12 million range, making her one of the lower-end cast members by net worth, which has actually been a recurring point of tension on the show itself.

Why net worth changes between seasons

Net worth isn't static, and for RHOBH cast members specifically, several forces push it up or down between seasons. Business launches and closures are the biggest driver: a cast member who opens a boutique or expands a CPG brand into a major retailer will see their estimated net worth revised upward, while one who closes a business or faces litigation sees it go down. Bozoma's departure from the Netflix CMO role in March 2022, for example, ended what was almost certainly the highest single-year compensation stream of her career, which explains why some newer estimates for her are lower than older ones that assumed she was still collecting at that rate.

Real estate is the other major variable. Beverly Hills and surrounding areas saw significant price appreciation between 2020 and 2023, which inflated the property-based portion of many cast members' net worth estimates. As interest rates rose and the luxury market softened, some of those paper gains reversed. TV contracts also change: a cast member who returns after a season off may renegotiate upward, while someone who gets demoted from "main" to "friend" typically takes a significant pay cut. And endorsement income can spike sharply in the year after a cast member generates a major viral moment, then taper off over the following seasons.

Where estimates come from and how to spot an unreliable number

Most of the net worth figures you'll find online for RHOBH cast members originate from one of three sources: Celebrity Net Worth (which publishes individual profiles with explicit "Last Updated" dates), Forbes-style methodology applied to business ownership when verifiable revenue exists, or syndicated roundup articles that pull numbers from those same databases and republish them, sometimes without updating the figures or noting when they were last verified.

The verification checklist when you're comparing figures across sites is straightforward. First, check whether the page has a published update date. A figure from 2019 with no revision note is not the same as one updated in February 2026. Second, check whether the page cites any inputs: business ownership, property records, career history. A page that just says "$10 million" with no supporting context is a republished guess. Third, check whether the site acknowledges limitations. Reputable net worth publishers explicitly note that their figures are estimates based on available public information, not audited financial statements. Sites that present a single number as a definitive fact without any caveat should be weighted less heavily.

The Bozoma Saint John discrepancy is a useful case study. One widely syndicated figure puts her at $10 million; another outlet reports "over $30 million." Both are circulating at the same time, citing different databases with different as-of assumptions. Neither number is definitively wrong because neither reflects a public audit. The $10 million figure likely reflects a conservative model based on verifiable income streams. The $30 million figure likely incorporates estimated equity from past stock compensation at Uber or Netflix, which is highly speculative but not unreasonable. The honest answer is that her net worth is somewhere between those numbers, and the exact figure depends heavily on what happened with her equity grants and how much of her executive compensation she retained versus spent.

Why numbers differ across sites, update frequency, and income vs. assets

Different sites show different net worth figures for the same person for three main reasons: they use different inputs, they updated their estimates at different times, and they make different assumptions about unverifiable items like private equity stakes and stock compensation. A site that last touched a profile in 2022 will show a number that predates any business developments, legal proceedings, or real estate transactions that happened since then. That's not necessarily negligence; it's just the nature of estimating the finances of private individuals who don't file public disclosures.

Update frequency varies widely. Some major net worth sites update profiles on a rolling basis when new information becomes available (a business launch, a headline-generating legal case, or a new TV contract). Others update on a fixed schedule, annually or less frequently. The Crystal Kung Minkoff profile on Celebrity Net Worth, for example, carries a "Last Updated: February 3, 2026" timestamp, which at least gives you a reference point. When you see two different numbers, comparing the most recent update date on each is often the fastest way to decide which one reflects more current information.

Income and net worth are not the same thing, and this is probably the most common source of confusion. A housewife who earns $2 million per season in TV fees has high income. But if she has a mortgage on a $15 million house, a business with outstanding loans, and a lifestyle spend that matches her income, her net worth may be far lower than you'd expect from her salary alone. Net worth is the balance sheet: what's owned outright after subtracting what's owed. Income is the cash flow. High earners with high spending and high debt can have surprisingly low net worth, and the RHOBH cast, which is filmed in one of the most expensive ZIP codes in the country, is especially susceptible to this dynamic.

Finally, for anyone tracking RHOBH cast finances over time: the most reliable approach is to bookmark profiles on sites that publish explicit update dates, cross-reference against any reported business news (a new retail partnership, a restaurant closure, a legal settlement), and treat any figure without a date or methodology note as a placeholder rather than a fact. Net worth estimates for private individuals are always approximations, and treating them as anything more precise than a well-informed range will lead you astray.